Nutrition · Supplements

Supplements: Why They Only Work After the Foundations Are in Place

This guide is a way to think about them: what a supplement is and how it is regulated, why they are supplemental, the six foundations that have to come first, what the largest trials say about whether they work, when supplementing is reasonable, how to judge quality and evidence without a brand name in sight, and the mistakes that cost the most. There is no shopping list at the end.

Meet the Medical Advisory Board
A wicker basket of fresh whole vegetables on a wooden table
Whole foods first: the foundation every supplement is built on. Photo by Vije Vijendranath on Unsplash.
Do supplements work?

Some do, for some people, in specific situations. Correcting a documented deficiency such as low vitamin D, low B12 or iron deficiency works well and is measurable. Taking supplements on top of an already adequate diet has shown little or no benefit for preventing heart disease, cancer or early death in large trials 1. The foundations of health are what make a supplement worth taking.

The short version

Supplements are supplemental. They fill a gap that food, sleep, stress, movement, sunlight and relationships have left open, and they do very little when those foundations are missing. About half of American adults take at least one supplement 2. The trials are consistent: in well-nourished people, adding vitamins and minerals does not lower the risk of cancer, heart disease or death, while correcting a true deficiency does change how a person feels and functions 1. The question is never "what should I take?" It is "what is missing, and why?"

  • Definition: A dietary supplement is a product taken by mouth that contains a dietary ingredient, such as a vitamin, mineral, herb, amino acid or enzyme, and it is regulated as a food, not a drug 3.
  • The evidence split: Big trials in replete adults are null. Trials in deficient people are positive. Those are two different questions and most supplement advice ignores the difference.
  • Foundations first: Whole foods, seven to nine hours of sleep, a managed stress load, daily movement, sunlight and real relationships. Each one has mortality data behind it that no pill can match.
  • When it is reasonable: A tested deficiency, a life stage with higher needs, a restricted diet, poor absorption, or a climate that blocks sunlight for months.
  • How to judge one: Evidence that matches your situation, a form your body can use, a dose inside the safe range, third-party testing, and a category that is not known for adulteration.
  • The biggest mistake: Using a supplement to skip a foundation. It never works for long.
At a glance
  • What it is: Any product taken by mouth to add a nutrient or other dietary ingredient to what you already eat.
  • The real goal: Fill a documented gap, never replace a foundation.
  • Biggest levers: Whole-food diet, sleep, stress, movement, sunlight, relationships, then targeted nutrients.
  • Best evidence: Correcting deficiency. Weakest evidence: prevention in people who are not deficient.
  • Track it: Bloodwork for vitamin D, B12, ferritin and other markers before and after, and how you feel.
  • Watch: Weight-loss, energy and sexual-enhancement products are where most emergency visits and adulteration cases come from.

Five things to understand about supplements

  1. A supplement is regulated like a food, not a drug. The FDA does not approve a supplement for safety or effectiveness before it is sold; the company selling it is responsible for that 4.

  2. Most of the null results come from people who did not need the nutrient. The VITAL trial, the DO-HEALTH trial and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review all studied largely replete adults 1 5 6.

  3. Deficiency is common, testable and correctable. By the 20 ng/mL definition, about four in ten American adults are low in vitamin D, and B12 deficiency rises with every year on a vegan diet 7 8.

  4. Nutrients from food and nutrients from pills are not the same claim. In a cohort of nearly 31,000 adults, adequate intake of several nutrients was linked to lower mortality only when it came from food 9.

  5. More is not better. High-dose vitamin E and beta carotene in smokers are the two clearest examples of a supplement doing harm 10 11.

What are supplements, really?

Quick answer

A dietary supplement is a product taken by mouth that contains one or more dietary ingredients, such as vitamins, minerals, herbs and botanicals, amino acids, enzymes, probiotics or concentrates of those ingredients. In the United States it is regulated as a category of food under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, which means it is not tested or approved by the FDA before it reaches a shelf 3 4.

The word matters. "Supplement" means an addition to something that already exists. In the law, that something is your diet. In practice it is wider than that: a supplement is an addition to your whole way of living, and it borrows its usefulness from everything else you are doing.

About half of U.S. adults use at least one. In the national survey data that run through 2012, 52 percent of adults reported taking a supplement in the previous 30 days, a figure that held steady for more than a decade even as multivitamin use slipped from 37 to 31 percent and vitamin D and fish oil use climbed 2. That is more than 100 million people making a decision few were ever taught how to make.

Here is what the regulation means in practice. A company can sell a supplement without proving it works. It cannot legally claim the product treats or cures a disease, but it can say the product "supports" a body system, and the line between those two is thin 4. The FDA can act against a product after it is on the market if it is adulterated or mislabeled. That is a real safeguard, and it runs behind the product rather than in front of it.

So the responsibility sits with the person taking the product and with whoever is advising them. That is the reason this page exists.

Why supplements are supplemental

Quick answer

A supplement works when it fills a specific gap in an otherwise sound foundation of food, sleep, stress management, movement, sunlight and relationships. When one of those foundations is missing, a supplement cannot stand in for it, because the nutrient it delivers depends on the rest of the body working well enough to absorb, activate and use it.

I want to reframe this at the start, because the culture gets it backwards. A supplement looks like a shortcut. It behaves like a patch. A patch is a fine thing when there is a small hole in a sound structure, and it is useless when the structure itself is failing. Nothing you read in favor of supplements on this site cancels that order of operations.

Take a nutrient as simple as vitamin D. It is fat-soluble, so it needs fat in the meal to be absorbed; in one trial, older adults who took vitamin D3 with a fat-containing meal absorbed 32 percent more of it than those who took it with a fat-free meal 12. Vitamin D and magnesium work as teammates, magnesium is involved in activating vitamin D, and isolated nutrients taken alone tend to be absorbed less well than nutrients taken together the way food delivers them. That is a clinical view, and the food-matrix research points the same direction. A pill's usefulness is conditional on what surrounds it: the meal, the mineral status, the gut lining, and the sleep that repairs the gut lining.

The position I keep coming back to reads: Food comes first. Nutrient-dense, real, whole foods before supplements, before anything. That is not a rule against supplements. I take them and recommend them; food is more important, and so is your sleep, and so is your movement.

The honest limit of that position is worth naming. The evidence that whole-food-based supplement forms absorb better than isolated forms is thinner than the enthusiasm for them, mine included. Some forms have data behind them, such as methylated B vitamins for people with certain gene variants, and many do not. Where I state a preference for a form on this site, treat it as a preference informed by practice rather than settled science.

The six foundations that have to come first

Quick answer

The six foundations are a whole-food diet, seven to nine hours of sleep, a managed stress load, daily movement, regular sunlight and close relationships. Each is tied to large differences in death and disease risk in long-term studies, and each one changes how well the body absorbs and uses nutrients. A supplement added on top of a broken foundation is spending money on the wrong problem.

They are ranked by how often a missing one explains the symptom you hoped a supplement would fix.

1. A whole-food diet

This is the foundation the other five stand on, and it is the one supplements are most often used to avoid. In a cohort of 30,899 U.S. adults followed for a median of six years, adequate intake of vitamin A, vitamin K, magnesium, zinc and copper was associated with lower all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, and the association held only when the nutrients came from food. Supplement use itself was not linked to lower mortality, and calcium above the tolerable upper limit, mostly from supplements, was linked to higher cancer mortality 9. That is observational data with the usual limits, and it is still the clearest single picture available of food versus pill.

On the other side of the ledger, ultra-processed food exposure was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular death, type 2 diabetes, anxiety and all-cause mortality across an umbrella review covering 9.9 million people 13. And when a food pattern was tested as an intervention rather than observed, a Mediterranean diet built on extra-virgin olive oil or nuts reduced major cardiovascular events by about 30 percent in high-risk adults 14. The "supplement" in that trial was olive oil and a handful of nuts.

Why: Food delivers nutrients with their cofactors, their fiber and their fat, in the amounts the body evolved to handle. The 50 most nutrient-dense foods are where to start, long before any bottle.

2. Sleep

Most repair happens while you sleep. Across 16 prospective studies covering 1.38 million people, short sleep was associated with a 12 percent higher risk of death and long sleep with a 30 percent higher risk, the second number most likely reflecting underlying illness rather than sleep itself 15. No nutrient reverses the effect of a chronically short night.

Sleep is also where nutrient status gets used. Immune repair, the clearing of metabolic waste from the brain and the resetting of the cortisol rhythm all happen overnight. Shortchange it and the day's vitamin D, magnesium and protein have less to work with. If sleep deprivation is the reality, fix it before fixing the cabinet.

Why: Sleep is the one foundation that cannot be outsourced, and it sets the hormonal environment every other input works inside.

3. A managed stress load

Chronic psychological stress is associated with depression, cardiovascular disease, faster progression of HIV and slower wound healing, and the pathways run through the stress-hormone axis and the immune system 16. Stress raises cortisol, cortisol changes how the gut absorbs and how the kidneys excrete, and the loop feeds itself: stress burns through minerals, and low mineral status worsens the stress response.

This is the foundation most often "treated" with a supplement, because it is the hardest to change. An adaptogen or a mineral can take the edge off. It cannot remove the load. If your cortisol rhythm is flat or inverted, the fix is upstream, in how the day is structured, and the chronic stress guide covers it.

Why: Stress is a nutrient-depleting state, so supplementing against it without reducing it is pouring water into a bucket with a hole in it.

4. Daily movement

In a harmonized analysis of eight cohorts that measured activity with accelerometers rather than questionnaires, higher total physical activity at any intensity was associated with substantially lower mortality, and the most sedentary quarter of adults had more than two and a half times the death rate of the least sedentary 17. The curve is steepest at the low end, which means the first 20 minutes of walking a day buys more than the last 20 minutes of a marathon.

Movement also rebuilds the machinery that uses nutrients. Across nearly 6,000 participants, exercise training increased the mitochondrial content of skeletal muscle, with gains that scaled with how much and how hard people trained 18. No supplement builds mitochondria the way a hard walk uphill does.

Why: Movement changes cellular energy machinery in a way no pill replicates, and the benefits of exercise start at doses almost anyone can meet.

5. Sunlight

Vitamin D is made in the skin from ultraviolet B light, and sensible sun exposure, along with fortified foods and supplements, is one of the three ways a person gets it 19. By the 20 ng/mL cutoff, 41.6 percent of U.S. adults were deficient in 2005 to 2006, and the rate reached 82 percent among Black adults and 69 percent among Hispanic adults 7. That is one of the reasons vitamin D is the nutrient I test first.

Morning light does a second job that has nothing to do with vitamin D. It anchors the circadian clock, which sets cortisol, melatonin and the timing of hunger for the whole day. Ten minutes outside within an hour of waking, without sunglasses, is one of the cheapest interventions you can make. The benefits of sunlight go well past one vitamin.

Why: Sunlight sets the clock that every other foundation runs on, and it is the one input a vitamin D capsule only partly replaces.

6. Relationships

Across 148 studies and 308,849 people, adults with stronger social relationships had 50 percent higher odds of survival over the follow-up period, an effect the authors placed alongside established risk factors such as smoking and inactivity 20. Loneliness is inflammatory, and connection lowers the stress hormones that suppress repair. Eat at least one meal a day with another person, and ask for help early, because you were not built to heal alone.

Why: Relationships shape stress, sleep and eating at the same time, so they move every other foundation at once.

A simple rule: if a symptom has not responded to a supplement, look for the missing foundation.

Do supplements work? What the big trials say

Quick answer

In healthy adults without a known deficiency, vitamin and mineral supplements have shown little or no benefit for preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease or death in large randomized trials. In people with a documented deficiency, correcting it produces measurable changes in bloodwork, symptoms and, in some trials, markers of biological aging. Both findings are true, and they answer different questions.

The internet has split into camps here, and both are half right. Here is the two-sided version.

The skeptic camp is right that:

  • Across 21 randomized trials in 91,074 adults, multivitamin-mineral supplements had no effect on all-cause mortality, vascular mortality or cancer mortality 21.

  • The 2022 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review of 84 studies found vitamin and mineral supplementation gave little or no benefit for preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease or death in healthy adults, with a small possible reduction in cancer incidence with multivitamins 1.

  • In the VITAL trial, 2,000 IU of vitamin D3 a day for about five years did not reduce invasive cancer or major cardiovascular events in 25,871 adults 5.

  • In DO-HEALTH, three years of vitamin D3, omega-3 or a home strength program, alone or combined, did not significantly improve blood pressure, fractures, physical performance, infections or cognition in 2,157 healthy adults over 70 6.

…but overreaches when it claims:

  • That supplements do nothing. Every one of those trials enrolled people who were largely replete and healthy at baseline. They tested adding a nutrient to people who had enough of it.

  • That the calcium and vitamin E harm signals apply to every supplement. They apply to high doses of specific nutrients in specific populations.

  • That a null result on mortality means a null result on how a person feels.

The supplement industry is right that:

  • Deficiency is common. Four in ten American adults were low in vitamin D by the 20 ng/mL definition, and B12 deficiency among vegans and long-term vegetarians runs from common to near-universal depending on the group studied 7 8.

  • Correcting deficiency does something. In a small trial of overweight adults with low vitamin D, 16 weeks of 4,000 IU a day slowed one measure of epigenetic aging by about 1.85 years compared with placebo 22.

  • Some nutrients show benefit even in reasonably healthy older adults. Daily multivitamins produced a small improvement in global cognition and episodic memory in the COSMOS substudies, an effect the authors described as equivalent to about two years less cognitive aging 23. And in a post-hoc DO-HEALTH analysis, omega-3 alone slowed three DNA-methylation aging clocks over three years, with the biggest effect when omega-3, vitamin D and exercise were combined 24.

…but overreaches when it claims:

  • That everyone needs a cabinet full. The COSMOS effect is small and in adults over 60. The omega-3 effect is measured in months, in a secondary analysis.

  • That daily vitamin D lowers cancer deaths for everyone. In the largest individual-patient meta-analysis, the pooled result was not significant; only the daily-dosing subgroup showed a roughly 12 percent reduction 25.

  • That "natural" means safe at any dose. High-dose vitamin E was associated with higher all-cause mortality in a meta-analysis of 19 trials, and beta carotene raised lung cancer incidence by 18 percent in male smokers 10 11.

The resolution reframes the question. "Do supplements work?" has no answer, because the honest reading is that the evidence is split along one line: deficient or replete. The question that has an answer is "Are you short on something, and how would you know?" Everything that follows is built to answer it.

One more thing, because it is my byline. My stated position is that targeted supplementation with nutrients like vitamin D, magnesium and omega-3s is essential for correcting deficiencies when it is guided by bloodwork. The mainstream reading of the trials above is more skeptical. Where that position goes further than the trial data strictly supports is in how often subclinical shortfalls are present and worth addressing, and in a preference for whole-food-based forms. Those are clinical judgments, held and attributed as such, and never dressed up as trial results.

When is it reasonable to supplement?

Quick answer

Supplementing is reasonable when a blood test shows a deficiency, when a life stage raises needs beyond what food can meet, when a restricted diet removes a nutrient's food sources, when a gut or medical condition blocks absorption, or when geography and season block the sun for months. Outside those situations, the first move is to look at the foundations.

The way to decide whether you need a nutrient is the same every time: what is missing, why is it missing, and can food fix it. Here are the situations where the answer to the third question is often no.

The situations where supplementing is reasonable, and how you would know

SituationWhat tends to run shortHow you would find out
Little sun exposure, northern latitude, darker skin, or indoor workVitamin D25-hydroxyvitamin D blood test
Vegan or long-term vegetarian dietVitamin B12, sometimes iron, zinc and omega-3B12 with methylmalonic acid, ferritin, complete blood count
Heavy menstrual periods, pregnancy, endurance trainingIronFerritin and complete blood count
Gut conditions, low stomach acid, bariatric surgery, some medicationsMultiple, often B12, iron, magnesium and fat-soluble vitaminsPanel guided by the condition
Pregnancy and breastfeedingFolate, iron, iodine, choline, vitamin DPrenatal labs
Adults over 65Vitamin B12, vitamin D, sometimes protein and magnesiumB12, vitamin D, metabolic panel
High stress, poor sleep, high sweat lossMagnesiumRed blood cell magnesium; serum is a poor marker

A few of these deserve a sentence each, because they are the ones I see most.

Vitamin D. Roughly four in ten adults are below 20 ng/mL, and the number climbs with darker skin and with every degree of latitude away from the equator 7. I want my patients above 50 ng/mL, and nobody knows where they sit without a test. The signs of vitamin D deficiency are vague enough that testing beats guessing.

Vitamin B12. Vegans and long-term vegetarians are at real risk, with deficiency rates that rise with years on the diet and run higher among vegans than among vegetarians 8. Older adults lose stomach acid and with it the ability to free B12 from food. This is the one deficiency where a supplement rarely needs a debate, because the food sources are animal foods and some people will not eat them. Read the B12 deficiency symptoms if fatigue and tingling are part of your picture.

Iron. Iron-deficiency anemia is one of the most common nutritional problems in the world, and its causes are blood loss, low intake and malabsorption 26. Because the cause decides the fix, I never want anyone taking iron without a ferritin result and a reason. The iron deficiency guide covers both the food and the testing side.

Magnesium. Serum magnesium is a poor marker because the body defends blood levels at the expense of the cells, so the signs of magnesium deficiency are a better first screen than the standard lab. The evidence for correcting it is real and modest: across double-blind trials magnesium lowered blood pressure by a small amount, and in older adults with insomnia it produced small improvements in sleep measures on low-to-moderate quality evidence 27 28.

One first-person detail, because it is on the record. I once tested low in a single B vitamin, riboflavin, and correcting that one measured shortfall is what gave me my energy back. The lesson was never "take B vitamins." It was "test, then correct the thing that is low."

How to evaluate a supplement

Quick answer

Judge a supplement on six things: whether the evidence was gathered in people like the person taking it, whether the form and dose sit inside what the trials used and below the tolerable upper limit, whether the product carries third-party testing for identity and contaminants, whether the category is one known for adulteration, and whether it interacts with other medications. Price and marketing tell you nothing.

Here is the framework, without a single product named, because the framework is what transfers to whatever you are holding.

1. Does the evidence match your situation?

The most common evidence error is reading a positive trial in deficient people and applying it to someone who is not deficient, or reading a null trial in replete people and concluding a nutrient is useless for someone who is low. Before taking anything, ask: who was in the study, what did they lack, and what did the study measure? A trial that moved a blood marker did not necessarily move a symptom. A trial that moved a symptom in people over 70 says little about a 35-year-old.

2. Is the form one your body can use?

Forms matter, and this is where clinical experience and the research overlap most. Fat-soluble vitamins need fat in the meal; a vitamin D3 dose taken with a fat-containing meal was absorbed 32 percent better than the same dose taken with a fat-free meal 12. B vitamins in their methylated or activated forms bypass a conversion step that some people handle poorly. Minerals bound to amino acids tend to be gentler on the gut than oxide forms. My preference, stated as a preference, is for forms that come from or resemble food, with their cofactors present, and for nutrients that work together rather than in isolation.

3. Is the dose inside the evidence and below the upper limit?

More is not better, and the two clearest cautionary tales are worth knowing by name. A meta-analysis of 19 trials found that vitamin E at 400 IU a day or more was associated with higher all-cause mortality, with the risk rising above about 150 IU a day, though most of the high-dose trials were in people with chronic disease 10. In the ATBC trial, beta carotene supplements raised lung cancer incidence by 18 percent in male smokers 11. Calcium from supplements above 1,000 mg a day tracked with higher cancer mortality in the NHANES cohort 9. Every nutrient has a tolerable upper intake level published by the National Academies. A label that sits above it calls for a reason and a clinician, not a coupon.

4. Is it tested by someone other than the company selling it?

Because the FDA does not test a supplement before it is sold, third-party verification is the closest thing to an outside check that the bottle contains what the label says and does not contain what it should not 4. Look for a named independent testing program on the label, and ask for a certificate of analysis. A company that will not show its testing is telling you something.

5. Is the category one with a known adulteration problem?

From 2007 to 2016 the FDA identified 776 adulterated supplements from 146 companies, and most were marketed for sexual enhancement, weight loss or muscle building, with undeclared prescription drugs inside them 29. Those same categories drive the emergency room data: an estimated 23,000 ER visits a year are attributed to supplement adverse events, and among young adults the visits are commonly cardiovascular symptoms from weight-loss and energy products 30. A basic vitamin D or magnesium product is not where that risk lives. A "fat burner" from an unfamiliar website is.

6. Does it interact with anything?

Supplements interact with medications and with each other. Herbs can change how the liver clears drugs, minerals compete for absorption, and fat-soluble vitamins accumulate. Bring the bottle to your physician or pharmacist.

What to check before you take anything

CheckWhat to look forRed flag
EvidenceTrials in comparable people, measuring an outcome that mattersA single mouse study on the marketing page
FormOne your body absorbs and can useA form the trials never used
DoseInside the studied range, below the upper limitMegadoses sold as "extra strength"
TestingIndependent third-party verification, certificate of analysisNo testing named, none offered
CategoryVitamins, minerals, well-studied botanicalsWeight loss, sexual enhancement, muscle building from unknown sellers
InteractionsReviewed with your physician or pharmacist"Safe with everything"

The supplement mistakes that cost you most

Quick answer

The most common supplement mistakes are using a supplement to avoid a foundation, taking nutrients without ever testing, assuming more is better, taking isolated nutrients without their cofactors, buying by marketing rather than evidence, ignoring interactions, and expecting a pill to fix a symptom whose cause was never found.

They are ranked by how much harm and wasted money each one causes you.

  1. Supplementing instead of sleeping. A stress-support blend at 11 p.m. will not repair what six hours of sleep is breaking. Fix the schedule first.

  2. Never testing. Vitamin D, B12, ferritin, red cell magnesium and a basic metabolic panel cost less than a few months of guessing. Test, correct, retest.

  3. Assuming more is better. The vitamin E, beta carotene and calcium data above are the reason every nutrient has an upper limit 9 10 11.

  4. Taking isolated nutrients without their partners. Vitamin D without magnesium, zinc without copper, calcium without vitamin K2 and D. That is a clinical view rather than a trial result, and it is the way food delivers nutrients in the first place.

  5. Buying the marketing. "Clinically studied" on a label may refer to one ingredient, at a different dose, in a different population. Read the study.

  6. Ignoring interactions. Herbs and medications do not always mix, and nobody checks unless you ask.

  7. Treating a symptom whose cause was never found. Fatigue can be iron, thyroid, sleep apnea, depression or a dozen other things. A supplement that helps a little can delay the test that finds the cause.

  8. Stacking a dozen products and changing them all at once. If something helps or harms, nobody will know which one did it. Add one thing at a time, for long enough to judge it.

What food first means in practice

Quick answer

Food first means building the plate around nutrient-dense whole foods so that most nutrient needs are met by eating, then testing for the shortfalls that food could not close, then correcting those specific shortfalls. It is an order of operations, not a rule against supplements.

People hear "food first" and assume it means anti-supplement. It does not. I take them, and my patients take them. Food first is a sequence. The reason it is the right sequence comes from the food matrix: nutrients in a whole food arrive with the fat, the fiber, the cofactors and the other nutrients that help the body absorb and use them. Food functions together as a whole, and a fish is a better delivery system for omega-3s than most capsules. When a patient is going to supplement omega-3s anyway, I steer them toward the less-processed forms, and I still tell them to eat the sardines.

In practice, most of the plate is vegetables, fruit, quality protein, healthy fats and, if you tolerate them, properly prepared grains and legumes. Organ meats, shellfish, eggs, fermented foods and bone broth carry more nutrients per bite than almost anything in a bottle. Ultra-processed food displaces the foods that would have closed the gap in the first place, which the ultra-processed foods guide explains.

Then, and only then, comes the question of what food could not close. On a vegan diet, that is B12. In Minnesota in February, that is often vitamin D. With heavy periods, it may be iron. Those are real gaps, and closing them with a supplement is the right use of one.

How to think about supplementation: an order of operations

Quick answer

Fix the foundations, test for what is missing, correct the specific shortfall with a form and dose supported by evidence, retest, and stop what is not doing anything. That order keeps supplements in their proper role and keeps you from spending money on a problem that was never a nutrient problem.

Here is the sequence, in order.

  1. Audit the six foundations. Whole-food diet, sleep, stress load, movement, sunlight, relationships. Write down which ones are missing. Most people find two.

  2. Fix the cheapest missing foundation first. Morning light and a consistent bedtime cost nothing. Start there.

  3. Test before you supplement. At minimum: 25-hydroxyvitamin D, B12, ferritin, a complete blood count and a metabolic panel. Add red cell magnesium if sleep, cramps or anxiety are part of the picture.

  4. Correct the specific shortfall. Choose the nutrient the test named, in a form the body can use, at a dose inside the evidence and below the upper limit, from a product with third-party testing.

  5. Retest in 8 to 12 weeks. A supplement that did not move the marker is either the wrong form, the wrong dose, or the wrong diagnosis.

  6. Stop what is not doing anything. Every product in your cabinet should be able to answer one question: why is it there?

To see how that thinking turns into a daily rhythm, the supplement routine guide is the practical companion to this page: it covers timing, food pairing and how to structure a day. This page is the philosophy behind it.

Who should be more careful with supplements?
  • Anyone on prescription medication, because interactions are rarely checked.

  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women, who need specific nutrients in specific amounts and should avoid most herbal products without physician guidance.

  • People with kidney disease, for whom potassium, magnesium and calcium loads that are trivial for others can be dangerous.

  • Smokers and former heavy smokers, for whom beta carotene supplements raised lung cancer risk 11.

  • Older adults taking many pills, since choking or trouble swallowing accounted for nearly four in ten supplement-related emergency visits among adults 65 and older 30.

  • Anyone buying weight-loss, sexual-enhancement or muscle products from unfamiliar sellers, which is where nearly all the adulteration cases come from 29.

The bottom line

The bottom line on supplements

Should you take supplements? For a specific, tested shortfall, yes, and it can change how you feel. As a substitute for food, sleep, stress management, movement, sunlight or people, no, and the largest trials we have say so.

The honest reading of the evidence is split along one line. In adults who already have enough, adding more does little. In adults who are short, correcting the shortfall does a lot. The whole discipline of supplementing well is knowing which side of that line a person is on, and the way to find out is testing rather than guessing.

So build the foundations, test for what is missing, correct the specific gap in a form and dose the evidence supports, retest, and stop what is not working. A supplement can fill a gap. It cannot replace the thing the gap was standing in for.

Frequently asked questions

Is there a best supplement everyone should take?

No. The trials that looked for a universal benefit from a daily multivitamin in healthy adults found no effect on mortality across 91,074 people, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found little or no preventive benefit from vitamins and minerals in people without deficiency 21 1. The "best supplement" is the one that corrects something a test showed was short, and for many people the daily "supplement" that matters most is sleep, sunlight and a real meal.

Do supplements really work?

Yes, in the right situation. Correcting a documented deficiency works and is measurable; in one trial, vitamin D3 in adults who were low slowed a marker of epigenetic aging by about 1.85 years over 16 weeks 22. Adding vitamins to an already adequate diet has shown little or no benefit for preventing cancer, heart disease or death 1.

Are supplements necessary if I eat well?

Often not, with a few exceptions that depend on the person rather than the food. Sunlight, latitude and skin tone decide vitamin D more than diet does, and 41.6 percent of U.S. adults were below 20 ng/mL in national survey data 7. Age, gut health and medications decide B12 absorption. Eating well handles most nutrients; testing tells you which ones it did not.

How do you know if you have a real deficiency?

A blood test. Vitamin D is measured as 25-hydroxyvitamin D, B12 status is best measured with methylmalonic acid alongside B12, iron status with ferritin and a complete blood count, and magnesium status with a red blood cell magnesium since serum levels are a poor marker 19 8 26. Symptoms alone are not enough, because fatigue, brain fog and poor sleep have many causes.

How can you tell if a supplement is good quality?

Look for independent third-party testing named on the label, a certificate of analysis available on request, a form and dose that match what the trials used, and a category that is not known for adulteration. The FDA does not test supplements before sale, so that outside verification is doing the job the regulation does not 4.

Can you take too many supplements?

Yes. High-dose vitamin E was associated with higher all-cause mortality in a meta-analysis of 19 trials, beta carotene raised lung cancer risk in smokers, and calcium above the upper limit from supplements tracked with higher cancer mortality 9 10 11. Every vitamin and mineral has a tolerable upper intake level, and stacking several products can push past it without anyone noticing.

Should you take supplements with food?

Usually, and for fat-soluble nutrients almost always. Vitamin D3 taken with a fat-containing meal was absorbed 32 percent better than with a fat-free meal in one trial of older adults 12. Food also buffers minerals that irritate an empty stomach. The exception is the handful of nutrients that compete with food for absorption, such as iron with calcium or coffee, which are better taken apart.

What does food first mean?

It means most of your nutrient needs should be met by eating nutrient-dense whole foods, and supplements are used for the specific gaps that food could not close. In a cohort of nearly 31,000 adults, nutrient intake was linked to lower mortality only when it came from food, which is the clearest data behind the sequence 9.

Freshness & method note

September 2026.Published. New page for the supplements section of DrAxe.com, replacing the previous category listing. Covers the definition and regulation of dietary supplements, the six foundations, a two-sided reading of the major prevention trials (VITAL, DO-HEALTH, COSMOS, the 2022 USPSTF review), the situations in which supplementing is reasonable, a brand-free evaluation framework, common mistakes and an order of operations. 30 sources cited, none of them product or retail pages. Why it was written this way: This page states a philosophy and recommends no products. It carries no ranked list of supplements by design.

References

  1. O'Connor EA, Evans CV, Ivlev I, et al. Vitamin and Mineral Supplements for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2022;327(23):2334-2347.
  2. Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Du M, White E, Giovannucci EL. Trends in Dietary Supplement Use Among US Adults From 1999-2012. JAMA. 2016;316(14):1464-1474.
  3. Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health. Dietary Supplements: What You Need to Know. Updated January 4, 2023. Accessed September 8, 2026.
  4. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA 101: Dietary Supplements. Accessed September 8, 2026.
  5. Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, et al. Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):33-44.
  6. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vellas B, Rizzoli R, et al. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation, Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation, or a Strength-Training Exercise Program on Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults: The DO-HEALTH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;324(18):1855-1868.
  7. Forrest KY, Stuhldreher WL. Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency in US adults. Nutr Res. 2011;31(1):48-54.
  8. Pawlak R, Parrott SJ, Raj S, Cullum-Dugan D, Lucus D. How prevalent is vitamin B(12) deficiency among vegetarians? Nutr Rev. 2013;71(2):110-117.
  9. Chen F, Du M, Blumberg JB, et al. Association Among Dietary Supplement Use, Nutrient Intake, and Mortality Among U.S. Adults: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(9):604-613.
  10. Miller ER 3rd, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, Riemersma RA, Appel LJ, Guallar E. Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(1):37-46.
  11. Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group. The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(15):1029-1035.
  12. Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Lichtenstein AH, Dolnikowski G, Palermo NJ, Rasmussen H. Dietary fat increases vitamin D-3 absorption. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(2):225-230.
  13. Lane MM, Gamage E, Du S, et al. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses. BMJ. 2024;384:e077310.
  14. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet Supplemented with Extra-Virgin Olive Oil or Nuts. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):e34.
  15. Cappuccio FP, D'Elia L, Strazzullo P, Miller MA. Sleep duration and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep. 2010;33(5):585-592.
  16. Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Miller GE. Psychological stress and disease. JAMA. 2007;298(14):1685-1687.
  17. Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4570.
  18. Mølmen KS, Almquist NW, Skattebo Ø. Effects of Exercise Training on Mitochondrial and Capillary Growth in Human Skeletal Muscle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression. Sports Med. 2025;55(1):115-144.
  19. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266-281.
  20. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316.
  21. Macpherson H, Pipingas A, Pase MP. Multivitamin-multimineral supplementation and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(2):437-444.
  22. Chen L, Dong Y, Bhagatwala J, Raed A, Huang Y, Zhu H. Effects of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Epigenetic Aging in Overweight and Obese African Americans With Suboptimal Vitamin D Status: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(1):91-98.
  23. Vyas CM, Manson JE, Sesso HD, et al. Effect of multivitamin-mineral supplementation versus placebo on cognitive function: results from the clinic subcohort of the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis of 3 cognitive studies within COSMOS. Am J Clin Nutr. 2024;119(3):692-701.
  24. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gängler S, Wieczorek M, et al. Individual and additive effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and exercise on DNA methylation clocks of biological aging in older adults from the DO-HEALTH trial. Nat Aging. 2025;5(3):376-385.
  25. Kuznia S, Zhu A, Akutsu T, et al. Efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation on cancer mortality: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;87:101923.
  26. Camaschella C. Iron-deficiency anemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1832-1843.
  27. Zhang X, Li Y, Del Gobbo LC, et al. Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trials. Hypertension. 2016;68(2):324-333.
  28. Mah J, Pitre T. Oral magnesium supplementation for insomnia in older adults: a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021;21(1):125.
  29. Tucker J, Fischer T, Upjohn L, Mazzera D, Kumar M. Unapproved Pharmaceutical Ingredients Included in Dietary Supplements Associated With US Food and Drug Administration Warnings. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(6):e183337.
  30. Geller AI, Shehab N, Weidle NJ, et al. Emergency Department Visits for Adverse Events Related to Dietary Supplements. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(16):1531-1540.
Dr. Josh Axe, DNM, DC, CNS
Doctor of Natural Medicine · Founder, DrAxe.com

Dr. Axe is a certified doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, and multiple New York Times bestselling author. He has spent 20+ years in clinical practice helping people heal at the root cause and founded one of the most-visited natural-health platforms in the world.

Read the full bio →
This page recommends no products and links to no retailer. Dr. Axe is a co-founder of a supplement company; that relationship did not determine which studies are cited here or how they are read, and the editorial team applied the same sourcing standard used across DrAxe.com.

This article is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Supplements can interact with medications and medical conditions. Use them alongside, never instead of, medical care, and talk with your physician or pharmacist before starting, stopping or combining any supplement, especially if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, managing a chronic condition or taking prescription medication.

Advertisement20% off Ancient Nutrition Multi Collagen Protein, code MCP20